4.6 Article

Effects of the Ethyne Flow Ratio on Structures and Mechanical Properties of Reactive High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering Deposited Chromium-Carbon Films

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11080873

Keywords

chromium carbide; amorphous carbon; ethyne; high-power impulse magnetron sputtering

Funding

  1. Supati Cooperation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the deposition of chromium-carbon films, increasing the ethyne ratio results in a linear increase in carbon content, a transition in microstructure from dense glassy to columnar or clustered, and a decrease in sp2-C bonding while an increase in Cr-C bonding with decreasing ethyne ratio. These changes lead to a shift from a hydrogenated amorphous carbon phase to a glassy amorphous chromium carbide phase, significantly impacting film hardness and elasticity.
Chromium-carbon films were deposited by utilizing reactive high-power impulse magnetron sputtering with different mixture ratios of ethyne and argon with a constant deposition total pressure while the deposition temperature, pulse frequency, duty cycle and average power of the chromium cathode remain the same. The microstructure and chemical bonding of the obtained films within different composition were compared. The results show that with the increasing ethyne ratio, the carbon content in films increases linearly with two slopes. Moreover, the microstructure of the deposited film changes from a dense glassy structure into a columnar structure, even a clusters structure. The sp2-C bonding in films decreases but the Cr-C bonding increases with decreasing the ethyne ratio. This reveals the main phase of films changes from a hydrogenated amorphous carbon phase into a glassy amorphous chromium carbide phase. Such changes of the microstructure and phase cause a large difference on the film hardness and elasticity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available