4.5 Article

Comparison of MMS Observations of Foreshock Bubbles With a Global Hybrid Simulation

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JA028848

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [80NSSC18K1036]
  2. MMS project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multi-point observations of foreshock bubbles were compared with hybrid simulation predictions, showing good agreement. The presence of discontinuities and bubbles upstream from the bow shock was confirmed, with observations matching characteristics predicted by the simulation. This connection plays an important role in the formation of foreshock transients.
We present multi-point observations of foreshock bubbles (FBs) for comparison with the predictions of hybrid simulations. The four Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft observed a series of discontinuities in the region upstream from the bow shock on December 18, 2017. Two solar wind discontinuities were associated with fully developed FBs with core regions exhibiting greatly decelerated and deflected antisunward flows, significant increases in temperature, and depressed plasma densities and magnetic field strengths. A single shock lies upstream (sunward) from each of the two bubbles. The connection to the foreshock before and/or after the discontinuities can play an important role in the foreshock transient formation. We present the predictions of a 2.5-D global hybrid simulation for the presence of the FBs for two different interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) cone angles (66 degrees and 25 degrees). The topology of the simulated FB is nearly hemispherical for small angles, but becomes linear for large angles. We show that the characteristics of the two simulated FBs for the two different discontinuity normals and IMF cone angles are in good agreement with the observational results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available