4.7 Article

Impact of a Single 36 Hours Prolonged Fasting Period in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes - A Cross-Over Controlled Trial

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.656346

Keywords

fasting; type 1 diabetes; CGM; safety; OGTT (oral glucose tolerance test)

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [KLIF-851]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that individuals with type 1 diabetes can safely undergo a 36-hour fasting period with a low risk of hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis.
Prolonged fasting has shown beneficial effects in healthy individuals and in people with chronic diseases. In type 1 diabetes, the effect or even the feasibility of fasting is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact and safety of prolonged fasting in adults with type 1 diabetes. Glycemia was assessed during overnight fasting (12 hours) vs. prolonged fasting (36 hours) via an intermittently-scanned continuous glucose monitoring system. Anthropometric data, metabolic and hormonal markers were compared between both trial arms. After each fasting period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed and plasma glucose levels and hormones were assessed. Data were compared via paired t-tests and mixed-model regressions (p <= 0.05). Twenty individuals with type 1 diabetes (7 females) with a mean +/- SD age of 35 +/- 11 years, body mass index (BMI) 24.8 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2) and HbA(1c) 54 +/- 7 mmol/mol were included. Hypoglycemia/hour (70 mg/dL; <3.9 mmol/L) was similar in both trial arms (12 hrs: 0.07 +/- 0.06 vs. 36 hrs: 0.05 +/- 0.03, p=0.21). Glycemic excursions during the oral glucose tolerance test were not different after the two fasting periods. Beta-hydroxybutyrate levels were higher after prolonged fasting (p=0.0006). Our study showed that people with type 1 diabetes can safely perform a 36 hours fasting period with a low risk of hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available