4.7 Article

Sex Steroids and Osteoarthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.683226

Keywords

Mendelian randomization; osteoarthritis; dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; estradiol; testosterone; dihydrotestosterone

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772360]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a positive causal association between serum testosterone level and the risks of hip osteoarthritis and hip replacement surgery, as well as a positive association between serum dihydrotestosterone level and the risk of hip replacement with potential causality in hip osteoarthritis.
Objective Sex steroids are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). This study investigated the causal role of sex steroids in site- and sex-specific OA and risk of joint replacement surgery using the Mendelian randomization (MR) method. Methods Instrumental variables for estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, testosterone (T), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) were selected. We used the inverse variance weighting (IVW) approach as the main MR method to estimate causal effects based on the summary-level data for OA and joint replacement surgery from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Results A positive causal association was observed between serum T level and risks of hip OA (odds ratio [OR]=1.558, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.193-2.034; P=0.001) and hip replacement (OR=1.013, 95% CI: 1.008-1.018; P=2.15x10(-8)). Serum DHT level was also positively associated with the risk of hip replacement (OR=1.011, 95% CI: 1.006-1.015; P=4.03x10(-7)) and had potential causality with hip OA (OR=1.398, 95% CI: 1.054-1.855; P=0.020). Conclusions Serum T and DHT levels may play causal roles in the development of hip OA and contribute to the risk of hip replacement, although the underlying mechanisms require further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available