4.6 Review

Understanding Factors in Group B Streptococcus Late-Onset Disease

Journal

INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 3207-3218

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S291511

Keywords

neonatal sepsis; prevention; infant; meningitis; CC17

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Group B streptococcus (GBS) infection remains a leading cause of sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis in infants, with early onset cases decreasing due to widespread use of intrapartum antibiotics, leading to late-onset infections as common presentation. The pathogenesis, mode of transmission, and risk factors for LOGBS are unclear, hindering effective prevention efforts.
Group B streptococcus (GBS) infection remains a leading cause of sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis in infants. Rates of GBS early onset disease have declined following the widcespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis; hence, late-onset infections (LOGBS) are currently a common presentation of neonatal GBS dicsease. The pathogenesis, mode of transmission, and risk factors associated with LOGBS are unclear, which interfere with effective prevention efforts. GBS may be transmitted from the mother to the infant at the time of delivery or during the postpartum period via contaminated breast milk, or as nosocomial or community-acquired infection. Maternal GBS colonization, prematurity, young maternal age, HIV exposure, and ethnicity (Black) are identified as risk factors for LOGBS disease; however, further studies are necessary to confirm additional risk factors, if any, for the implementation of effective prevention strategies. This narrative review discusses current and previous studies that have reported LOGBS. Few well designed studies have described this condition; therefore, reliable assessment of maternal GBS colonization, breastfeeding, and twin delivery as risk factors for LOGBS remains limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available