4.6 Article

Genomic Insights Into the Admixture History of Mongolic- and Tungusic-Speaking Populations From Southwestern East Asia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.685285

Keywords

population history; genetic structure; genetic admixture; East Asia; population genetics

Funding

  1. Guizhou Scientific Support Project, Qian Science Support (2021) [448]
  2. Shanghai Key Lab of Forensic Medicine, Key Lab of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, China (Academy of Forensic Science) [KF202009]
  3. Guizhou Province Education Department, Characteristic Region Project, Qian Education [(2021)065]
  4. Guizhou Hundred Highlevel Innovative Talent Project, Qian Science Platform Talents [(2020)6012]
  5. Guizhou Scientific Support Project, Qian Science Support [(2020)4Y057, (2019)2825]
  6. Guizhou Science Project, Qian Science Foundation [(2020)1Y353]
  7. Guizhou Scientific Cultivation Project, Qian Science Platform Talent [(2018)5779-X]
  8. Guizhou Engineering Technology Research Center Project, Qian High-Tech of Development and Reform Commission [(2016)1345]
  9. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31801040]
  10. Nanqiang Outstanding Young Talents Program of Xiamen University [X2123302]
  11. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZK1144]
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [ERC-2019-ADG-883700-TRAM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic study on Mongolian and Manchu populations from Guizhou province in southwestern China suggests a strong genetic affinity with southern East Asians, stemming from a mixture of northern Tungusic/Mongolic speakers or Yellow River farmers and southern Austronesian, Tai-Kadai, and Austroasiatic speakers. This intermixing of ancestries likely occurred during the Mongolian Empire expansion approximately 600 to 1,000 years ago.
As a major part of the modern Trans-Eurasian or Altaic language family, most of the Mongolic and Tungusic languages were mainly spoken in northern China, Mongolia, and southern Siberia, but some were also found in southern China. Previous genetic surveys only focused on the dissection of genetic structure of northern Altaic-speaking populations; however, the ancestral origin and genomic diversification of Mongolic and Tungusic-speaking populations from southwestern East Asia remain poorly understood because of the paucity of high-density sampling and genome-wide data. Here, we generated genome-wide data at nearly 700,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 26 Mongolians and 55 Manchus collected from Guizhou province in southwestern China. We applied principal component analysis (PCA), ADMIXTURE, f statistics, qpWave/qpAdm analysis, qpGraph, TreeMix, Fst, and ALDER to infer the fine-scale population genetic structure and admixture history. We found significant genetic differentiation between northern and southern Mongolic and Tungusic speakers, as one specific genetic cline of Manchu and Mongolian was identified in Guizhou province. Further results from ADMIXTURE and f statistics showed that the studied Guizhou Mongolians and Manchus had a strong genetic affinity with southern East Asians, especially for inland southern East Asians. The qpAdm-based estimates of ancestry admixture proportion demonstrated that Guizhou Mongolians and Manchus people could be modeled as the admixtures of one northern ancestry related to northern Tungusic/Mongolic speakers or Yellow River farmers and one southern ancestry associated with Austronesian, Tai-Kadai, and Austroasiatic speakers. The qpGraph-based phylogeny and neighbor-joining tree further confirmed that Guizhou Manchus and Mongolians derived approximately half of the ancestry from their northern ancestors and the other half from southern Indigenous East Asians. The estimated admixture time ranged from 600 to 1,000 years ago, which further confirmed the admixture events were mediated via the Mongolians Empire expansion during the formation of the Yuan dynasty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available