4.7 Article

Honeycomb structure is promising for the repair of human bone defects

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109832

Keywords

Selective laser melting; Bone scaffold; Mechanical property; Permeability; Wall shear stress

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1100600]
  2. Applied Basic Research Project of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2020YJ0265]
  3. Sichuan University-Luzhou Municipal People's Government Strategic Cooperation Project [2019CDLZ-17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the feasibility and promise of using honeycomb structures in the design of biomimetic bone scaffolds, which matched human bone's elastic modulus and exhibited higher yield strength. Additionally, the permeability of the scaffolds is similar to that of cancellous bone, facilitating cell growth and bone tissue regeneration.
In this paper, the results of the study on the performance of four groups of different honeycomb structures show that the application of honeycomb structure in the design of biomimetic bone scaffold is feasible and promising. In terms of static properties, the elastic modulus (1.6-3 GPa) of the four scaffolds matched the elastic modulus of human cancellous bone (0.1-4.5 GPa), and the yield strength (88-146 MPa) was much higher than that of the femoral neck (0.56-3.71 MPa). In terms of permeability, except for the excessive permeability of SU scaffold, the permeability of the other three groups of scaffolds (1.5*10(-8)-4.8*10(-8) m(2)) are all in the range of cancellous bone permeability (0.5*10(-8)-5.0*10(-8) m(2)). In terms of the distribution of wall shear stress, the wall shear stress of the four groups of scaffolds ranged from 2.8 to 42.8 MPa, which could stimulate cells to deposit mineralized extracellular matrix (0.55-30 MPa) in the 3D scaffold, which was conducive to bone tissue regeneration. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available