4.7 Article Data Paper

A curated dataset of modern and ancient high-coverage shotgun human genomes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00980-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. HERA Joint Research Programme Uses of the Past
  2. European Union [649307]
  3. ERC Consolidator Grant [647797]
  4. Herchel Smith Research Fellowship
  5. ERC starting grant ADNABIOARC [263441]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [263441] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a dataset containing genome data from 35 ancient human samples along with the genetic pipeline used for processing them. This resource allows researchers to analyze new samples and compare them to the reference dataset without re-processing published samples. The dataset can be easily expanded to increase sample distribution across time and space.
Over the last few years, genome-wide data for a large number of ancient human samples have been collected. Whilst datasets of captured SNPs have been collated, high coverage shotgun genomes (which are relatively few but allow certain types of analyses not possible with ascertained captured SNPs) have to be reprocessed by individual groups from raw reads. This task is computationally intensive. Here, we release a dataset including 35 whole-genome sequenced samples, previously published and distributed worldwide, together with the genetic pipeline used to process them. The dataset contains 72,041,355 sites called across 19 ancient and 16 modern individuals and includes sequence data from four previously published ancient samples which we sequenced to higher coverage (10-18x). Such a resource will allow researchers to analyse their new samples with the same genetic pipeline and directly compare them to the reference dataset without re-processing published samples. Moreover, this dataset can be easily expanded to increase the sample distribution both across time and space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available