4.7 Article

A community challenge to evaluate RNA-seq, fusion detection, and isoform quantification methods for cancer discovery

Journal

CELL SYSTEMS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 827-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. ITCR [R01CA180778]
  3. Oregon Health AMP
  4. Science University [U24CA210957, U24CA143799, HHSN261200800001E]
  5. UCLA [P30CA016042]
  6. Sage Bionetworks [5U24CA209923]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling in RNA (SMC-RNA) challenge aimed to benchmark methods for RNA isoform quantification and fusion detection from bulk cancer RNA sequencing data, which is crucial for analyzing the cancer transcriptome. The evaluation compared 77 fusion detection entries and 65 isoform quantification entries on 51 synthetic tumors and 32 cell lines with spiked-in fusion constructs.
The accurate identification and quantitation of RNA isoforms present in the cancer transcriptome is key for analyses ranging from the inference of the impacts of somatic variants to pathway analysis to biomarker development and subtype discovery. The ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling in RNA (SMC-RNA) challenge was a crowd-sourced effort to benchmark methods for RNA isoform quantification and fusion detection from bulk cancer RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. It concluded in 2018 with a comparison of 77 fusion detection entries and 65 isoform quantification entries on 51 synthetic tumors and 32 cell lines with spiked-in fusion constructs. We report the entries used to build this benchmark, the leaderboard results, and the experimental features associated with the accurate prediction of RNA species. This challenge required submissions to be in the form of containerized workflows, meaning each of the entries described is easily reusable through CWL and Docker containers at https://github.com/SMC-RNA-challenge. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available