4.2 Article

Strategies to minimize SARS-CoV-2 transmission in classroom settings: combined impacts of ventilation and mask effective filtration efficiency

Journal

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 1181-1203

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2021.1944665

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study indicates that aerosol transmission is a significant mode of transmission for the novel coronavirus, and ventilation plays a crucial role in reducing infection risk. Properly donned masks and improved filtration efficiency can effectively reduce the probability of infection.
Strong evidence exists indicating that aerosol transmission of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a significant transmission modality. We experimentally evaluated the impact of ventilation on aerosol dynamics and distribution along with the effective filtration efficiency (EFE) of four different mask types, with and without mask fitters, in a classroom setting. These were used to estimate aerosol conditional infection probability using the Wells-Riley model for three scenarios with different ventilation and mask interventions. Aerosol measurements confirmed that aerosol in the room was uniform within a factor of 2 for distances >2 m from the source. Mask EFE results demonstrate that most masks fit poorly with estimated leakage rates typically >50%. However, EFEs approaching the mask material FE were achievable using mask fitters. Infection probability estimates indicate that ventilation alone is not able to achieve probabilities <0.01 (1%). The use of moderate to high EFE masks reduces infection probability, >5x in some cases. Reductions provided by ventilation and masks are synergistic and multiplicative. The results reinforce the use of properly donned masks to achieve reduced aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious diseases and motivate improvements in the EFE of masks through improved design or use of mask fitters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available