4.6 Article

Rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with MTX/Ara-C in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: 15-year follow-up of a phase II study from the MD Anderson Cancer Center

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 1, Pages 80-88

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13796

Keywords

mantle cell lymphoma; hyper-CVAD; methotrexate; treatment; secondary malignancy

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672, P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA008748, P30 CA016672] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive chemotherapy regimens containing cytarabine have substantially improved remission durability and overall survival in younger adults with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, there have been no long-term follow-up results for patients treated with these regimens. We present long-term survival outcomes from a pivotal phase II trial of rituximab, hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine (R-HCVAD/MA). At 15 years of follow-up (median: 13.4 years), the median failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 4.8 years and 10.7 years, respectively. The FFS seems to have plateaued after 10 years, with an estimated 15-year FFS of 30% in younger patients (<= 65 years). Patients who achieved complete response (CR) after 2 cycles had a favourable median FFS of 8.8 years. Six patients developed myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML) whilst in first CR. The 10-year cumulative incidence of MDS/AML of patients in first remission was 6.2% (95% confidence interval: 2.5-12.2%). In patients with newly diagnosed MCL, R-HCVAD/MA showed sustained efficacy, with a median OS exceeding 10 years in all patients and freedom from disease recurrence of nearly 15 years in almost one-third of the younger patients (<= 65 years).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available