4.6 Article

Backarc spreading and mantle wedge flow beneath the Japan Sea: insight from Rayleigh-wave anisotropic tomography

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 207, Issue 1, Pages 357-373

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggw288

Keywords

Surface waves and free oscillations; Seismic anisotropy; Seismic tomography; Subduction zone processes; Backarc basin processes

Funding

  1. JSPS [Kiban-S 23224012]
  2. MEXT [26106005]
  3. Chinese NSFC [41190072, 41325009]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551957]
  5. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [BS2015HZ001]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201513058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first high-resolution Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity azimuthal anisotropy tomography of the Japan subduction zone at periods of 20-150 s, which is determined using a large number of high-quality amplitude and phase data of teleseismic fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves. The obtained 2-D anisotropic phase-velocity models are then inverted for a 3-D shear-wave velocity azimuthal anisotropy tomography down to a depth of similar to 300 km beneath Japan. The subducting Pacific slab is imaged as a dipping high-velocity zone with trench-parallel fast-velocity directions (FVDs) which may indicate the anisotropy arising from the normal faults produced at the outer-rise area near the Japan trench axis, overprinting the slab fossil fabric, whereas the mantle wedge generally exhibits lower velocities with trench-normal FVDs which reflect subduction-driven corner flow and anisotropy. Depth variations of azimuthal anisotropy are revealed in the big mantle wedge beneath the Japan Sea, which may reflect past deformations in the Eurasian lithosphere related to backarc spreading during 21 to 15 Ma and complex current convection in the asthenosphere induced by active subductions of both the Pacific and Philippine Sea plates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available