4.8 Review

Multispecies coalescent and its applications to infer species phylogenies and cross-species gene flow

Journal

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab127

Keywords

anomaly zone; BPP; deep coalescence; gene flow; Markov chain Monte Carlo; multispecies coalescent; species tree

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/P006493/1, BB/T003502/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/P006493/1, BB/T003502/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Multispecies Coalescent (MSC) model extends the single-population coalescent model to multiple species, allowing for estimation of species divergence times, population sizes, species trees, and inference of cross-species gene flow and species delimitation. This framework faces statistical and computational challenges, but research advancements are leading the way towards breakthroughs in the field in the next few years.
Multispecies coalescent (MSC) is the extension of the single-population coalescent model to multiple species. It integrates the phylogenetic process of species divergences and the population genetic process of coalescent, and provides a powerful framework for a number of inference problems using genomic sequence data from multiple species, including estimation of species divergence times and population sizes, estimation of species trees accommodating discordant gene trees, inference of cross-species gene flow and species delimitation. In this review, we introduce the major features of the MSC model, discuss full-likelihood and heuristic methods of species tree estimation and summarize recent methodological advances in inference of cross-species gene flow. We discuss the statistical and computational challenges in the field and research directions where breakthroughs may be likely in the next few years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available