4.4 Article

Imaging Analysis of the High-Intensity Zone on Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Images: Classification, Features and Correlation with Low Back Pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 2981-2989

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S332509

Keywords

lumbar spine; intervertebral disc; MRI; high-intensity zone; low back pain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that MRI-visualized HIZ is a valuable method for screening lumbar IDD. Consecutive-slide HIZ is a more reliable indicator for discogenic back pain.
Aim: Early studies suggested that the high-intensity zone (HIZ) on lumbar MRI was a diagnostic sign of painful internal disc disruption (IDD). However, recent studies have questioned its diagnostic value. This study is conducted to explore imaging features of HIZ and to investigate the correlation between these characteristics and low back pain (LBP), further studying the predictive value of HIZ. Methods: A retrospective study of 1188 cases was performed. MR images were read and analyzed by two experienced, blinded radiologists. Results: A total of 575 (48.4%) individuals exhibited HIZ. The prevalence of posterior HIZ (32.3%) was significantly higher than that of anterior HIZ (23.6%; P < 0.01). Round type was the most common shape (61.0%) on sagittal view. Only 37 HIZs (4.6%) were identified on axial views. A total of 263 HIZ discs (32.5%) were found to have additional diagnostic signs of IDD, which is difficult to distinguish from the annulus fibrosus. In subjects with consecutive slides showing HIZ, the incidence of LBP was significantly higher than in single-slide HIZ individuals (58.0% vs 48.6%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: MRI-visualized HIZ is a highly valuable method of screening for lumbar IDD. It is demonstrated that consecutive-slide HIZ was a more reliable indicator for discogenic LBP than single-slide HIZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available