4.6 Article

Effect of anionic group [SiO4]4-/[PO4]3- on the luminescence properties of Dy3+-doped tungstate structural compounds

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CERAMICS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 843-851

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-021-0478-x

Keywords

phosphors; scheelite structure; luminescence property; anion substitution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51872269, 51672257]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652018305, 2652017335]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel scheelite structures of fluorescent materials were successfully prepared using a high-temperature solid-phase process. Tests revealed that certain phosphors showed good luminescence properties and could be used in the fabrication of LED devices.
Novel scheelite structures of Li2Ca(WO4)(2), Li2Ca2(WO4)(SiO4), and LiCa2(WO4)(PO4) fluorescent materials were successfully prepared using a high-temperature solid-phase process. The compounds were characterized by X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive spectroscopy. The tests revealed that the substitution of [WO4](2-) by [SiO4](4-) or [PO4](3-) tetrahedron in tungstate had no significant influence on the crystal structure of the Li2Ca(WO4)(2). When Dy3+ ions were introduced as an activator at an optimum doping concentration of 0.08 mol%, all of the as-prepared phosphors generated yellow light emissions, and the emission peak was located close to 576 nm. Replacing [WO4](2-) with [SiO4](4-) or [PO4](3-) tetrahedron significantly increased the luminescence of the Li2Ca(WO4)(2) phosphors. Among them, the LiCa2(WO4)(PO4):0.08Dy(3+) phosphor had the best luminescence properties, decay life (tau = 0.049 ms), and thermal stability (87.8%). In addition, the as-prepared yellow Li2Ca(WO4)(2):0.08Dy(3+), Li2Ca2(WO4)(SiO4):0.08Dy(3+), and LiCa2(WO4)(PO4):0.08Dy(3+) phosphor can be used to fabricate white light emitting diode (LED) devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available