4.5 Article

Formalizing Parameter Constraints to Support Intelligent Geoprocessing: A SHACL-Based Method

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10090605

Keywords

intelligent geoprocessing; parameter constraints; input data validation; formalization; heuristic evaluation; application context

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA23100503]
  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a novel method to formalize the parameter constraints of geoprocessing tools, based on SHACL and geoprocessing ontologies, which is comparatively easier and more efficient than existing methods. The proposed method not only covers more types of parameter constraints but also includes application-context-matching constraints that have been ignored by other methods.
Intelligent geoprocessing relies heavily on formalized parameter constraints of geoprocessing tools to validate the input data and to further ensure the robustness and reliability of geoprocessing. However, existing methods developed to formalize parameter constraints are either designed based on ill-suited assumptions, which may not correctly identify the invalid parameter inputs situation, or are inefficient to use. This paper proposes a novel method to formalize the parameter constraints of geoprocessing tools, based on a high-level and standard constraint language (i.e., SHACL) and geoprocessing ontologies, under the guidance of a systematic classification of parameter constraints. An application case and a heuristic evaluation were conducted to demonstrate and evaluate the effectiveness and usability of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method is not only comparatively easier and more efficient than existing methods but also covers more types of parameter constraints, for example, the application-context-matching constraints that have been ignored by existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available