4.6 Article

Array comparative genomic hybridization reveals similarities between nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma and T cell/histiocyte rich large B cell lymphoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 3, Pages 415-422

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13310

Keywords

nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma; T cell; histiocyte rich large B cell lymphoma; array classic comparative genomic hybridization

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HA6145/1-1, HA6145/1-2]
  2. Cancer Research Society (CRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) and T cell/histiocyte rich large B cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) usually affect middle-aged men, show tumour cells with a B cell phenotype and a low tumour cell content. Whereas the clinical behaviour of NLPHL is indolent, THRLBCL presents with advanced stage disease and an aggressive behaviour. In the present study, array comparative genomic hybridization was performed in seven typical NLPHL, four THRLBCL-like NLPHL variants, six THRLBCL and four diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) derived from NLPHL. The number of genomic aberrations was higher in THRLBCL compared with typical and THRLBCL-like variant of NLPHL. Gains of 2p16.1 and losses of 2p11.2 and 9p11.2 were commonly observed in typical and THRLBCL-like variants of NLPHL as well as THRLBCL. Gains of 2p16.1, affecting the REL locus were confirmed in an independent cohort. Expression of the REL protein was observed at similar frequencies in typical and THRLBCL-like variant of NLPHL as well as THRLBCL (33-38%). In conclusion, the present study reveals further similarities between NLPHL and THRLBCL on the genomic level, confirming thatthese entities are part of a pathobiological spectrum with common molecular features, but varying clinical presentations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available