4.8 Article

Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.620847

Keywords

beef cattle; genomic selection; ticks; tropical adaptation; host resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [305102/2018-4]
  2. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria [02.12.02.008.00, 02.13.10.002, 12.13.14.014.00]
  3. Beef Cooperative Research Centre
  4. Commonwealth Government funding through the CRC program
  5. Meat and Livestock Australia
  6. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
  7. Northern Pastoral Group
  8. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  9. UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office under the Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH) [OPP1127286]
  10. University of Edinburgh, SRUC (Scotland's Rural College)
  11. International Livestock Research Institute
  12. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/30002275]
  13. Red Meat Research and Development of South Africa (RMRD-SA), Technology Innovation Agency (TIA)
  14. National Research Foundation (NRF) [CPRR14071676305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated tick resistance in multiple beef cattle breeds, revealing differences in genetic correlations and heritability among populations, as well as the potential benefits of multi-trait genomic selection. The multi-trait approach improved predictive ability and corrected over-dispersion of GEBV, showing promise for enhancing tick resistance in beef cattle through genomic selection.
Ticks cause substantial production losses for beef and dairy cattle. Cattle resistance to ticks is one of the most important factors affecting tick control, but largely neglected due to the challenge of phenotyping. In this study, we evaluate the pooling of tick resistance phenotyped reference populations from multi-country beef cattle breeds to assess the possibility of improving host resistance through multi-trait genomic selection. Data consisted of tick counts or scores assessing the number of female ticks at least 4.5 mm length and derived from seven populations, with breed, country, number of records and genotyped/phenotyped animals being respectively: Angus (AN), Brazil, 2,263, 921/1,156, Hereford (HH), Brazil, 6,615, 1,910/2,802, Brangus (BN), Brazil, 2,441, 851/851, Braford (BO), Brazil, 9,523, 3,062/4,095, Tropical Composite (TC), Australia, 229, 229/229, Brahman (BR), Australia, 675, 675/675, and Nguni (NG), South Africa, 490, 490/490. All populations were genotyped using medium density Illumina SNP BeadChips and imputed to a common high-density panel of 332,468 markers. The mean linkage disequilibrium (LD) between adjacent SNPs varied from 0.24 to 0.37 across populations and so was sufficient to allow genomic breeding values (GEBV) prediction. Correlations of LD phase between breeds were higher between composites and their founder breeds (0.81 to 0.95) and lower between NG and the other breeds (0.27 and 0.35). There was wide range of estimated heritability (0.05 and 0.42) and genetic correlation (-0.01 and 0.87) for tick resistance across the studied populations, with the largest genetic correlation observed between BN and BO. Predictive ability was improved under the old-young validation for three of the seven populations using a multi-trait approach compared to a single trait within-population prediction, while whole and partial data GEBV correlations increased in all cases, with relative improvements ranging from 3% for BO to 64% for TC. Moreover, the multi-trait analysis was useful to correct typical over-dispersion of the GEBV. Results from this study indicate that a joint genomic evaluation of AN, HH, BN, BO and BR can be readily implemented to improve tick resistance of these populations using selection on GEBV. For NG and TC additional phenotyping will be required to obtain accurate GEBV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available