4.7 Article

Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Alpha Variant B.1.1.7 Tracking in Wastewater by Allele-Specific RT-qPCR

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 675-682

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00375

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore, under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program, Intra-CREATE Thematic Grant (Cities) Grant [NRF2019-THE001-0003a]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education
  3. National Research Foundation through an RCE award
  4. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness
  5. China Evergrande Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a detection method for tracking the B.1.1.7 variant in wastewater, which can reliably detect low levels of B.1.1.7 and provide rapid and inexpensive surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants.
The critical need for surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern has prompted the development of methods that can track variants in wastewater. Here, we develop and present an open-source method based on allele-specific RT-qPCR (AS RT-qPCR) that detects and quantifies the B.1.1.7 variant, targeting spike protein mutations at three independent genomic loci that are highly predictive of B.1.1.7 (HV69/70del, Y144del, and A570D). Our assays can reliably detect and quantify low levels of B.1.1.7 with low cross-reactivity, and at variant proportions down to 1% in a background of mixed SARS-CoV-2. Applying our method to wastewater samples from the United States, we track the occurrence of B.1.1.7 over time in 19 communities. AS RT-qPCR results align with clinical trends, and summation of B.1.1.7 and wild-type sequences quantified by our assays matches SARS-CoV-2 levels indicated by the U.S. CDC N1 and N2 assays. This work paves the way for AS RT-qPCR as a method for rapid inexpensive surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants in wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available