4.7 Article

Wastewater Surveillance during Mass COVID-19 Vaccination on a College Campus

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 792-798

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00519

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [2027752]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that after widespread COVID-19 vaccination, levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater solids on a university campus correlated with the number of COVID-19 cases, and after the second vaccine dose, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was rarely detected in wastewater solids. Wastewater monitoring can assist in environmental surveillance of COVID-19 at the community water level.
The suitability of wastewater monitoring following wide-spread vaccination against COVID-19 remains uncertain. SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels were monitored in wastewater solids during a university mass vaccination campaign in which >90% of the 12280 students were fully vaccinated (Pfizer-BioNTech, BNT162b2). SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in wastewater solids correlated with the 7-day average of COVID-19 cases when lagged by 1-3 days (rho = 0.51-0.55; p = 0.023-0.039). During and after the second vaccine dose, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in wastewater solids on 19 of 21 days (12 consecutive days of nondetection at the end of the semester), a significant decrease (p = 0.027) in positivity rate. A large influx of outside visitors (move out and commencement) led to an immediate increase in wastewater SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity (seven detections over seven days). Wastewater solids offer a sensitive matrix for environmental surveillance of COVID-19 at the subsewershed level (50% probability of RNA detection with two cases) both during and after mass vaccination. Mass vaccination was coincident with decreased shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA into wastewater. This suggests the absence of a large population of shedding infections, symptomatic or not, following mass vaccination among a university campus population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available