4.6 Review

BIM Visual Programming Tools Applications in Infrastructure Projects: A State-of-the-Art Review

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11188343

Keywords

Building Information Modeling (BIM); infrastructure projects; visual programming; dynamo; grasshopper; python

Funding

  1. National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) [72200098]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BIA2017-86811-C2-1-R, BIA2017-86811-C2-2-R]
  3. FEDER [BIA2017-86811-C2-1-R, BIA2017-86811-C2-2-R]
  4. Secretaria d' Universitats i Recerca of the Generalitat de Catalunya through Agaur [2017 SGR 1481]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviews the current application of visual programming algorithms in BIM infrastructure projects and encourages scholars and engineers to implement VP tools in infrastructure projects.
Featured Application This study aims to review the state of the art of visual programming algorithm applications in BIM infrastructure projects. The Building Information Modeling (BIM) methodology improves architectural and infrastructure projects by digitizing their processes throughout their life cycle stages, such as design, construction, management, monitoring, and operation. In recent years, the automation of these processes has been favored by the use of visual programming (VP) tools that have replaced conventional programming languages for visual schemes. The use of these tools in architectural projects is becoming increasing popular. However, this is not the case in infrastructure projects, for which the use of VP algorithms remains scarce. The aim of this work is to encourage both scholars and engineers to implement VP tools in infrastructure projects. For this purpose, this work reviews, for the first time in the literature, the state-of-the-art and future research trends of VP tools in infrastructure projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available