4.6 Article

Influence of Some Additives on the Properties of OPC Solidified Sandy Silt

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11167252

Keywords

sandy silt; solidification; additives; mechanical properties; microstructure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678533]
  2. Zhejiang Province Basic Public Welfare Research Project [LGG21E080012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the effect of additive type and mass fraction on the microstructure and mechanical properties of solidified sandy silt, determining the optimal contents of additives. The improvement of additive-modified OPC solidified sandy silt is attributed to the formation of crystalline compounds or composition improvement through field emission scanning electron and X-ray diffraction analysis.
The ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-based solidification process is used extensively to reinforce soils due to its available and good bonding properties. Alternative products are used in cementitious materials to enhance the strength and to reduce OPC consumption. In this study, the effect of additive type and mass fraction on the microstructure and mechanical properties of solidified sandy silt are investigated. There are four types of additives (gypsum, lime, clay particles, and fly ash) at mass fractions of 2, 3, and 4% that are considered in order to study their mechanical properties (unconfined compression, indirect tensile, flexural strength, and compressive resilient modulus) at 7, 14, 28, 60, and 90 days. The optimal contents of additive gypsum, clay particles, and fly ash are determined to be 2%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. Such improvement of additive-modified OPC solidified sandy silt is due to the formation of the crystalline compound or the gradation composition improvement via field emission scanning electron and X-ray diffraction analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available