4.6 Article

Spindle Thermal Error Prediction Based on LSTM Deep Learning for a CNC Machine Tool

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11125444

Keywords

spindle thermal error; elbow method; long short-term memory (LSTM)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [MOST 109-2221-E-167-014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key temperature point selection algorithm and thermal error estimation method for spindle displacement in a machine tool were proposed, utilizing clustering and modeling techniques to achieve high accuracy in thermal displacement prediction. The combined methodology demonstrated excellent accuracy and robustness in experiments.
In the precision processing industry, maintaining the accuracy of machine tools for an extensive period is crucial. Machining accuracy is affected by numerous factors, among which spindle thermal elongation caused by an increase in machine temperature is the most common. This paper proposed a key temperature point selection algorithm and thermal error estimation method for spindle displacement in a machine tool. First, highly correlated temperature points were clustered into groups, and the characteristics of small differences within groups and large differences between groups were realized. The optimal number of key temperature points was then determined using the elbow method. Meanwhile, the long short-term memory (LSTM) modeling method was proposed to establish the relationship between the spindle thermal error and changes of the key temperature points. The results show the largest root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the proposed LSTM model and the key temperature point selection algorithm were within 0.6 mu m in the spindle thermal displacement experiments with different temperature changes. The results demonstrated that the combined methodology can provide improved accuracy and robustness in predicting the spindle thermal displacement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available