4.6 Article

The Intake of Pain Medication among Dentists and Dental Assistants with Musculoskeletal Disorders in Germany

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11188771

Keywords

MSD; musculoskeletal; pain; prevalence; therapy; medication; pain medication; analgesics; dental assistant; dentist; dental profession; dental health professional; questionnaire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that dentists and dental assistants with MSDs used different medications depending on the affected body region, with painkillers such as ibuprofen and systemic diclofenac being the most frequently taken medications by both occupational groups.
Background: Dentists (Ds) and dental assistants (DAs) have a high lifetime prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). In this context, it is assumed that they have an increased intake of substances such as pain medication. Currently, there exist no data on the use of medication among Ds and DAs with MSDs in Germany. Methods: The online questionnaire (i.e., the Nordic Questionnaire) analysed the medical therapies used by 389 Ds (240 f/149 m) and 406 DAs (401 f/5 m) to treat their MSDs. Results: Ds (28.3-11.5%) and DAs (29.4-10.3%) with MSDs took medication depending on the affected body region. A trend between the Ds and DAs in the intake of drug therapy and the frequency was found for the neck region (Ds: 21.1%, DAs: 28.7%). A single medication was taken most frequently (Ds: 60.0-33.3%, DAs: 71.4-27.3%). The frequency of use varied greatly for both occupational groups depending on the region affected. Conclusion: Ds and DAs perceived the need for medical therapies because of their MSDs. Painkillers such as ibuprofen and systemic diclofenac were the medications most frequently taken by both occupational groups. The intake of pain killers, most notably for the neck, should prevent sick leave.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available