4.1 Article

Simple hydro-economic tools for supporting small water supply agencies on sustainable irrigation water management

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 1810-1819

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2021.318

Keywords

decision support system; full cost of irrigation water; hydroeconomic modeling; irrigation water efficiency; Pinios; water resources management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to provide useful approaches for small water supply agencies facing multiple issues, using simple hydro-economic tools to address challenges and involving experts in water resources management and local policymakers. A representative case in Central Greece is examined to support sustainable management.
In the Mediterranean countries, agriculture poses challenges in terms of its production expectations, resources availability, pollution, general management and implementation of economic tools (e.g. full cost of irrigation water, according to the Water Framework Directive). This study attempts to provide useful approaches for small water supply agencies facing multiple management, funding, environmental, and practical issues. A representative case in Central Greece is examined, in order to describe the situation in understandable terms supporting sustainable management. Simple hydro-economic tools were used to address these challenges; water balance, profits from agriculture, water value, water quality, management strategies, and full cost of irrigation water were simulated and incorporated into a Decision Support System (DSS), using Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), involving experts on water resources management and local policymakers. This is the first hydro-economic study designed for a Greek rural agency, aiming to improve and encourage integrated monitoring and management at multiple levels, communicating more efficient water use approaches to local irrigation management communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available