4.5 Article

Copula-based multiple indicator kriging for non-Gaussian random fields

Journal

SPATIAL STATISTICS
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2021.100524

Keywords

Copula; Precipitation; Probabilistic prediction; Quantile kriging; Spatial prediction; Uncertainty quantification

Funding

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia [OSR-2019-CRG7-3800]
  2. IR/D program from the US National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. NSF [DMS-1712760]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a copula based multiple indicator kriging model for the analysis of non-Gaussian spatial data, which provides the entire predictive distribution function and demonstrates better predictive performance than traditional methods.
In spatial statistics, the kriging predictor is the best linear predictor at unsampled locations, but not the optimal predictor for non-Gaussian processes. In this paper, we introduce a copula based multiple indicator kriging model for the analysis of non Gaussian spatial data by thresholding the spatial observations at a given set of quantile values. The proposed copula model allows for flexible marginal distributions while modeling the spatial dependence via copulas. We show that the covariances required by kriging have a direct link to the chosen copula function. We then develop a semiparametric estimation procedure. The proposed method provides the entire predictive distribution function at a new location, and thus allows for both point and interval predictions. The proposed method demonstrates better predictive performance than the commonly used variogram approach and Gaussian kriging in the simulation studies. We illustrate our methods on precipitation data in Spain during November 2019, and heavy metal dataset in topsoil along the river Meuse, and obtain probability exceedance maps. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available