4.0 Article

Clinical Use of PROMIS, Neuro-QoL, TBI-QoL, and Other Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Individual Adult Clients with Cognitive and Language Disorders

Journal

SEMINARS IN SPEECH AND LANGUAGE
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 192-210

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731365

Keywords

patient-reported outcome measures; speech-language pathology; evidence-based practice; communication disorders

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [5299]
  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [U54GM104941]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PROMs assess health outcomes from the patient's perspective and are primarily used in clinical research. While they can also be used for individual clients, there is currently sparse evidence and guidance for this application, with more research needed to guide the interpretation of PROM scores for individual clients.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess health outcomes from the patient's perspective. The National Institutes of Health has invested in the creation of numerous PROMs that comprise the PROMIS, Neuro-QoL, and TBI-QoL measurement systems. Some of these PROMs are potentially useful as primary or secondary outcome measures, or as contextual variables for the treatment of adults with cognitive/language disorders. These PROMs were primarily created for clinical research and interpretation of group means. They also have potential for use with individual clients; however, at present there is only sparse evidence and direction for this application of PROMs. Previous research by Cohen and Hula (2020) described how PROMs could support evidence-based practices in speech-language pathology. This companion article extends upon that work to present clinicians with implementation information about obtaining, administering, scoring, and interpreting PROMs for individual clients with cognitive/language disorders. This includes considerations of the type and extent of communication support that is appropriate, implications of the relatively large measurement error that accompanies individual scores and pairs of scores, and recommendations for applying minimal detectable change values depending on the clinician's desired level of measurement precision. However, more research is needed to guide the interpretation of PROM scores for an individual client.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available