4.6 Review

Tumour heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics in colorectal cancer

Journal

ONCOGENESIS
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41389-021-00342-x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer is a global burden, characterized by an initial explosion of genetic diversity followed by neutral dynamics. Understanding the interplay between clonal populations during neutral evolution provides insights into the roles of driver genes in the progression from normal colonic epithelium to adenoma and carcinoma. Recent advances have focused on genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic factors, as well as the ecological and evolutionary processes that contribute to cancer development.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a global burden of disease. Our current understanding of CRC has progressed from initial discoveries which focused on the stepwise accumulation of key driver mutations, as encapsulated in the Vogelstein model, to one in which marked heterogeneity leads to a complex interplay between clonal populations. Current evidence suggests that an initial explosion, or Big Bang, of genetic diversity is followed by a period of neutral dynamics. A thorough understanding of this interplay between clonal populations during neutral evolution gives insights into the roles in which driver genes may participate in the progress from normal colonic epithelium to adenoma and carcinoma. Recent advances have focused not only on genetics, transcriptomics, and proteomics but have also investigated the ecological and evolutionary processes which transform normal cells into cancer. This review first describes the role which driver mutations play in the Vogelstein model and subsequently demonstrates the evidence which supports a more complex model. This article also aims to underscore the significance of tumour heterogeneity and diverse clonal populations in cancer progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available