4.7 Review

Nano-Biomaterials for Retinal Regeneration

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11081880

Keywords

nanoparticles; nanodisks; scaffolds; nano-biomaterials and retina; nanoscaffolds and retinal regeneration; nanoparticles and retinal regeneration

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY029709, EY016058]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness
  3. [P30EY04068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoscience and nanotechnology have revolutionized environmental sciences, particularly in the field of ocular tissue engineering and regenerative ophthalmology. The use of innovative nanomaterials offers promising prospects for improving eye health, but there are challenges and future directions that should be considered for further development in this area.
Nanoscience and nanotechnology have revolutionized key areas of environmental sciences, including biological and physical sciences. Nanoscience is useful in interconnecting these sciences to find new hybrid avenues targeted at improving daily life. Pharmaceuticals, regenerative medicine, and stem cell research are among the prominent segments of biological sciences that will be improved by nanostructure innovations. The present review was written to present a comprehensive insight into various emerging nanomaterials, such as nanoparticles, nanowires, hybrid nanostructures, and nanoscaffolds, that have been useful in mice for ocular tissue engineering and regeneration. Furthermore, the current status, future perspectives, and challenges of nanotechnology in tracking cells or nanostructures in the eye and their use in modified regenerative ophthalmology mechanisms have also been proposed and discussed in detail. In the present review, various research findings on the use of nano-biomaterials in retinal regeneration and retinal remediation are presented, and these findings might be useful for future clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available