4.7 Review

Emerging roles of circular RNAs in systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 212-222

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.02.028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673050, 81773310, 81872522, 82073429]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [201901070007E00046]
  3. Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18140901800]
  4. Excellent Subject Leader Program of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [2018BR30]
  5. Clinical Research Program of Shanghai Hospital Development Center [SHDC2020CR1014B, SHDC12018X06]
  6. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [20XD1403300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

circRNAs, a class of non-coding RNAs with covalently closed single-stranded structures, have been found to play crucial roles in SLE. These molecules offer fresh insights into the pathogenesis of SLE and its potential clinical applications, although current studies have limitations and future research prospects need to be considered.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs with covalently closed single-stranded structures lacking 5'-3' polarity and a polyadenine tail. Over recent years, a growing body of studies have been conducted to explore the roles of circRNAs in human diseases. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of autoantibodies and excessive inflammation, which impact multiple organs. Recent advances have begun to shed light on the roles of circRNAs in SLE, providing fresh insights into the pathogenesis of SLE and the latent capacity for translation into clinical applications. Here, we briefly introduce these star molecules and summarize their roles in SLE. In addition, we outline the limitations of the current studies and raise prospects for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available