4.5 Article

Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling through Conventional Jig, Air Jig, and Sensor-Based Sorting: A Comparison

Journal

MINERALS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min11080904

Keywords

construction and demolition waste; sensor-based sorting; wet jig; air jig

Funding

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents a comparison of concentration methods for treating construction and demolition waste, with the conventional jig showing particularly good results for concrete and gypsum particles. Sensor-based sorting should use concentration circuits for best results.
The paper presents a comparison of the concentration methods conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting to treat construction and demolition waste. All tests were made with concrete, brick, and gypsum particles and the tests aim to separate these materials into different size ranges, depending on the method. The equipment tested, conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting present good results to concentrate construction and demolition waste particles, with different concentrations and mass recoveries. The results show particularly good mass recoveries and particle concentration for conventional jig, especially for concrete and gypsum particles. Sensor-based sorting should preferably use concentration circuits for best results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available