4.5 Article

Detection of active schistosome infection by cell-free circulating DNA of Schistosoma japonicum in highly endemic areas in Sorsogon Province, the Philippines

Journal

ACTA TROPICA
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 178-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.05.003

Keywords

Schistosomiasis japonica; Diagnosis; Active infection; Cell-free circulating parasite DNA; Serum; Urine

Funding

  1. Collaborative Project
  2. Institute of Tropical Medicine (Nekken), Nagasaki University [22ippan-25]
  3. Health Labour Sciences Research
  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H20-Shinkosaiko-Ippan-016]
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [24590510]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24590510] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current status of schistosomiasis in highly endemic areas is difficult to determine by ovum detection because of the superficially low parasite load after mass drug administration, whereas the parasite transmission rates are still high. Cell-free parasite DNA is fragments of parasite-derived DNA existing in the host's body fluids. We conducted population-based studies to test the presence of cell-free schistosome DNA in endemic areas of Sorsogon Province, the Philippines. Schistosome DNA in the serum and urine of Kato-Katz (KK)-positive subjects was detected by PCR (100% sensitivity). Schistosome DNA was also detected from KK-negative subjects (9122 serum and 10/41 urine samples). Schistosome DNA was found to be network echogenic pattern (NW)-positive (serum 53.3%, urine 42.9%) or NW-negative (serum 25.5%, urine 20.8%) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-positive (serum 47.1%, urine 40%) or ELISA-negative (serum 33.3%, urine 13.3%). These results indicate that cell-free schistosome DNA is a promising diagnostic marker for active schistosome infection in the case of light infection. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available