4.5 Article

Comparative Study for Selective Lithium Recovery via Chemical Transformations during Incineration and Dynamic Pyrolysis of EV Li-Ion Batteries

Journal

METALS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11081240

Keywords

electric vehicles; Li-ion batteries; a combined method of recycling; pyrolysis; incineration; water leaching

Funding

  1. AForsk [19-695]
  2. VINNOVA [2020-04463]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective leaching of Li from spent LIBs was examined after thermal pretreatment by pyrolysis and incineration at 400-700°C for 30, 60, and 90 min, followed by water leaching with high temperature and high L/S ratio. Along with Li salts, AlF3 was also leached with an efficiency not higher than 3.5%. Thermal pretreatment time did not significantly affect Li leaching efficiency, but a higher L/S ratio led to higher leaching efficiency.
Selective leaching of Li from spent LIBs thermally pretreated by pyrolysis and incineration between 400 and 700 degrees C for 30, 60, and 90 min followed by water leaching at high temperature and high L/S ratio was examined. During the thermal pretreatment Li2CO3 and LiF were leached. Along with Li salts, AlF3 was also found to be leached with an efficiency not higher than 3.5%. The time of thermal pretreatment did not have a significant effect on Li leaching efficiency. The leaching efficiency of Li was higher with a higher L/S ratio. At a higher leaching temperature (80 degrees C), the leaching of Li was higher due to an increase in the solubility of present Li salts. The highest Li leaching efficiency of nearly 60% was observed from the sample pyrolyzed at 700 degrees C for 60 min under the leaching condition L/S ratio of 20:1 mL g(-1) at 80 degrees C for 3 h. Furthermore, the use of an excess of 10% of carbon in a form of graphite during the thermal treatment did not improve the leaching efficiency of Li.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available