4.5 Article

Orientation Dependence of High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of a <111> Oriented Single-Crystal Nickel-Based Superalloy

Journal

METALS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11081248

Keywords

superalloys; high cycle fatigue; crystal orientation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700700]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-I-0001-0013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study on high cycle fatigue testing of a Ni-based superalloy shows that orientation deviation significantly affects fatigue properties, with the best fatigue life appearing on precise orientation. As orientation deviation increases, the fatigue properties of the alloy degenerate significantly.
High cycle fatigue failure has been recognized as one of the major forms of failure of aero-engine blades. This paper presents the high cycle fatigue testing of a Ni-based superalloy near orientation at 800 degrees C. The fracture morphology and dislocation configuration were analyzed in detail by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to indicate the influence of orientation deviation degree on the high cycle fatigue properties. The results show that the orientation deviation significantly affects the initiation of the slip systems, which is closely related to fatigue performance. The best fatigue life appears on the precise orientation, and the deformation behavior is controlled by multiple sets of equivalent {111} slip systems. With the increase in orientation deviation, the fatigue properties of the alloy degenerate significantly. On the boundary of -, two groups of {111} slip systems with the maximum Schmid shear stress dominate the deformation behavior. On the other hand, on the - boundary, the formation of stacking faults and rapid cutting of gamma' precipitates results in a negative effect on the fatigue life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available