4.5 Article

Influence of Shot Peening on the Isothermal Fatigue Behavior of the Gamma Titanium Aluminide Ti-48Al-2Cr-2Nb at 750 °C

Journal

METALS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11071083

Keywords

shot peening; fatigue; gamma titanium aluminide; high temperature; residual stress; intermetallic

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [LA 1038/13]
  2. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2016/23/G/ST5/04128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shot peening can increase surface hardness and generate high compressive residual stresses near the surface, which have a positive effect on fatigue lifetime. However, it can also lead to surface notches and tensile residual stresses in the bulk material, negatively impacting cyclic lifetime.
One possibility to improve the fatigue life and strength of metallic materials is shot peening. However, at elevated temperatures, the induced residual stresses may relax. To investigate the influence of shot peening on high-temperature fatigue behavior, isothermal fatigue tests were conducted on shot-peened and untreated samples of gamma TiAl 48-2-2 at 750 degrees C in air. The shot-peened material was characterized using EBSD, microhardness, and residual stress analyses. Shot peening leads to a significant increase in surface hardness and high compressive residual stresses near the surface. Both effects may have a positive influence on lifetime. However, it also leads to surface notches and tensile residual stresses in the bulk material with a negative impact on cyclic lifetime. During fully reversed uniaxial tension-compression fatigue tests (R = -1) at a stress amplitude of 260 MPa, the positive effects dominate, and the fatigue lifetime increases. At a lower stress amplitude of 230 MPa, the negative effect of internal tensile residual stresses dominates, and the lifetime decreases. Shot peening leads to a transition from surface to volume crack initiation if the surface is not damaged by the shots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available