4.5 Article

Determination of Hot Stamping Friction Coefficient of 7075 Aluminum

Journal

METALS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11071111

Keywords

7075 aluminum alloy; hot stamping; friction coefficient; inverse problem optimization

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province of China [20200201056JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that using different lubricants can improve the quality of aluminum alloy hot stamped parts, with molybdenum disulfide lubricant showing better performance. The friction coefficients under different lubrication conditions can be accurately obtained using the inverse problem optimization method.
Aluminum alloy hot stamping technology can improve the formability of materials and obtain parts with high dimensional accuracy. Friction behavior in the hot stamping process is very important for forming quality. Accurate friction coefficient is helpful to improve the prediction accuracy of forming defects. It is hard to obtain the friction coefficient by simple experiments due to the complicated thermal-mechanical coupling and contact conditions during the hot stamping of aluminum alloys. In order to explore the effect of friction behavior on forming quality, hot stamping experiments of 7075 aluminum alloy U-shaped parts with different lubricants were carried out. The influence of different lubricants on the force-displacement curve, material inflow, surface appearance, and thickness distribution of the formed part was analyzed. The results showed that a good lubrication effect could be obtained with the molybdenum disulfide lubricant. The friction coefficient under different lubrication conditions was obtained by using the inverse problem optimization method. Compared with the experimental results, the determined friction coefficients could accurately predict the force-displacement curves and the thickness distributions of formed parts under different lubrication conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available