4.4 Article

Analysis of Translation in the Developing Mouse Brain using Polysome Profiling

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 171, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/62088

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSERC Discovery Grant [RGPIN/04246-2018]
  2. Mitacs Globalink Graduate Fellowship
  3. ACHRI Graduate Student Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proper development of the mammalian brain relies on a fine balance of neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation into different neural cell types, which is controlled by gene expression at multiple levels including transcription, post-transcription, and translation. Translational regulation plays a critical role in coordinating neural stem cell fate decisions, and polysome fractionation is a powerful tool for evaluating mRNA translational status. The polysome profiling pipeline presented in this study includes sucrose gradient preparation, tissue lysis, ultracentrifugation, and fractionation-based analysis of mRNA translational status.
The proper development of the mammalian brain relies on a fine balance of neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation into different neural cell types. This balance is tightly controlled by gene expression that is fine-tuned at multiple levels, including transcription, post-transcription and translation. In this regard, a growing body of evidence highlights a critical role of translational regulation in coordinating neural stem cell fate decisions. Polysome fractionation is a powerful tool for the assessment of mRNA translational status at both global and individual gene levels. Here, we present an in-house polysome profiling pipeline to assess translational efficiency in cells from the developing mouse cerebral cortex. We describe the protocols for sucrose gradient preparation, tissue lysis, ultracentrifugation and fractionation-based analysis of mRNA translational status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available