4.3 Review

Narrative review of socioeconomic and racial disparities in the treatment of early stage lung cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 3758-3763

Publisher

AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3181

Keywords

Disparity; inequity; race; lung cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the incidence of lung cancer appears to be similar between White and Black patients, Black patients are substantially less likely to receive curative intent surgery. Mitigation strategies exist to narrow this inequity. Lower socioeconomic status is associated with a higher incidence of lung cancer, lower utilization of surgery, and poorer outcomes after surgery.
Background: To review and discuss the current literature regarding socio-economic and racial disparities in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Background: Lung cancer is the most lethal solid organ malignancy in the United States, with the second-highest incidence of new malignances for both men and women. While overall survival for lung cancer is improving, significant socioeconomic and racial disparities in outcomes for lung cancer persist. Methods: Narrative review of peer reviewed literature synthesizing findings retrieved from searches of computerized databases, primary article reference lists, authoritative texts and expert options. Results: The current incidence of lung cancer appears to be similar between White and Black patients. However, Black patients are substantially less likely to receive curative intent surgery. Mitigation strategies do exist to narrow this inequity. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher incidence of lung cancer, lower utilization of surgery and poorer outcomes after surgery. Conclusions: Race and SES remain closely linked to outcomes in lung cancer. Outcomes are still worse when controlling for stage and specifically, in early-stage disease, surgical therapy is consistently underused in Black patients and patients of low SES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available