4.7 Article

Available C and N affect the utilization of glycine by soil microorganisms

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 32-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.07.022

Keywords

Organic N uptake; Soil microorganisms; Gross N mineralization; C/N ratio

Categories

Funding

  1. State Key Program of China [2016YFD0300904]
  2. National Scientific Foundation Project of China [41571290, 41301253, 41401291]
  3. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2015BAD05B03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil microorganisms utilize a wide range of mineral and organic nitrogen (N) sources. Organic molecules, such as amino acids, maybe taken up directly as intact molecules or deaminated extracellularly followed by the uptake of ammonium (NH4+). We determined the effect of available C (glucose) and N (ammonium sulfate) on the uptake of amino acid by microorganisms using a laboratory incubation experiment with glycine, NH4+ and different levels of glucose. A N-15-labelling mirror image approach was used to determine the mineralization rate of glycine-N and gross N mineralization over a 60 day-period in treatments with C and N additions. The,pre-incubation experiment showed that added glycine was consumed within 24 h in all treatments. With addition of NH4+, only 11% to 44% of glycine N was mineralized, showing that the direct uptake dominated when available C was limited. In soil amended with NI-IT and a high level of glucose (C/N ratio = 30), mineralization of glycine N remained low (5%) initially but increased to 65% by day 60, indicating a shift either from direct uptake of intact amino acids to extracellular deamination followed by uptake of NH4+, or increased intracellular deamination and excretion of NH4+. The results indicate that microorganisms can potentially satisfy both C and N requirements through direct assimilation of amino acids depending on the availability of soil C and N. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available