4.7 Article

Denitrification and associated N2O emissions are limited by phosphorus availability in a grassland soil

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 34-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.08.011

Keywords

N2O emission; N-15 recovery; Denitrification; Nitrification; Phosphorus limitation; Soil respiration

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT100100779]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effects of phosphorus (P) availability on nitrogen (N) loss through microbial nitrification and denitrification processes remain poorly understood. We conducted an incubation experiment to study the responses of N2O production after P (0 and 3 mg P kg(-1) soil) addition with and without NH4+ or NO3- (0 and 15 mg N kg(-1) soil) in a high P-fixing grassland soil. The N addition included a N-15 tracer (1 mg N-15 kg(-1)). In a separate experiment, we also investigated the effect of P availability on potential nitrification and denitrification. We hypothesised that the addition of P in the soil would increase N2O emission from microbial nitrification and denitrification and thereby less soil N-15-NH4+ and N-15-NO3- would be recovered. We found that P addition only significantly increased cumulative N2O emission and respiration in the NO3- treatment, suggesting stimulated activities of denitrifying microorganisms due to their relief from P limitation. However, a decrease in soil N-15 recovery after P addition in the NO3- treatment was not detected because of the very small loss of N as N2O (<0.3% of the applied N-15 tracer). Potential denitrification marginally increased with P addition, while potential nitrification was not affected by P addition. We conclude that P addition may increase gaseous loss of N as N2O in P-poor soils through microbial denitrification rather than nitrification when inorganic N is abundant. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available