4.6 Article

Increased Participation and Decreased Performance in Recreational Master Athletes in Berlin Marathon 1974-2019

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.631237

Keywords

marathon; running; participation; performance; age of peak performance; performance decline; sex differences in endurance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated participation and performance trends in the Berlin Marathon from 1974 to 2019, finding an overall increase in participants, particularly in women. However, performance decreased across all age groups over the years, except for the top ten recreational athletes who improved their performance.
The aspect of participation and performance trends in marathon running has been investigated mainly in marathons held in the United States of America (e.g., New York City Marathon, Boston Marathon), but not for the fastest course in the world, the Berlin Marathon held in Berlin, Germany. This study aimed to examine trends in participation and performance in the Berlin Marathon on all its previous 46 editions from 1974 to 2019, the largest dataset ever studied in this event with 696,225 finishers (after data cleaning). Athletes in all age groups increased their participation, except for male athletes aged 20-49 years and athletes of both sexes above 79 years of age. This overall increase in participation was more pronounced in women, but still, there are more men than women participating in Berlin Marathon nowadays. All age group athletes decreased their performance across years overall, whereas the top ten recreational athletes improved their performance over the years. Our findings improved the knowledge about the evolution of male and female marathoners across calendar years, especially for the fastest marathon race in the world, the Berlin Marathon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available