4.6 Article

Cardiac Kinetic Energy and Viscous Dissipation Rate From Radial Flow Data

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.725104

Keywords

blood flow; hemodynamics; ultrasonography; color Doppler echocardiography; kinetic energy; viscous dissipation rate

Categories

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [17PRE33660202, 18EIA33900046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have found correlations between kinetic energy and viscous dissipation rate in the left ventricle with heart health. While 4D-flow imaging or computational fluid dynamics can provide rich data, they are difficult to acquire clinically. Color Doppler echocardiography, on the other hand, is more commonly used clinically but has limitations in measuring blood flow velocity components.
Recent studies have correlated kinetic energy (KE) and viscous dissipation rate (VDR) in the left ventricle (LV) with heart health. These studies have relied on 4D-flow imaging or computational fluid dynamics modeling, which are able to measure, or compute, all 3 components (3C) of the blood flow velocity in 3 dimensional (3D) space. This richness of data is difficult to acquire clinically. Alternatively, color Doppler echocardiography (CDE) is more widespread clinically, but only measures a single radial component of velocity and typically only over a planar section. Because of this limitation, prior CDE-based studies have first reconstructed a second component of velocity in the measurement plane prior to evaluating VDR or KE. Herein, we propose 1C-based surrogates of KE and VDR that can be derived directly from the radial component of the flow velocity in the LV. Our results demonstrate that the proposed 1C-based surrogates of KE and VDR are generally as well-correlated with the true KE and VDR values as surrogates that use reconstructed 2C flow data. Moreover, the correlation of these 1C-based surrogates with the true values indicate that CDE (3D in particular) may be useful in evaluating these metrics in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available