4.6 Article

Autologous stem cell transplantation outcomes in elderly patients with B cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages 197-204

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13561

Keywords

lymphoma; transplantation; elderly

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [15556] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10144, NF-SI-0507-10370] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The precise role of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains unclear in patients over 60 years of age. There is potential for increased procedural morbidity and mortality, and differences in disease biology that could impact outcomes. We performed a retrospective single-centre review of 81 elderly B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT. Five-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 54.7% and 49.1% respectively. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 1 year was 1.3% and 2.5%, suggesting no major excess compared to younger cohorts. OS and PFS were significantly worse in those over 65 years compared to those aged 60-64 (47.6% vs. 57.7%, P = 0.0437, and 27.6% vs. 57.7%, P = 0.0052 at 5 years). This resulted largely from an increased relapse risk (RR) (53.8% vs. 30.1%, P = 0.0511) rather than excess NRM, and age remained independently significant for PFS on multivariate analyses [Hazard ratio 2.56 (1.35-4.84, P = 0.0052) for PFS and 1.89 (0.99-3.61, P = 0.054) for OS]. Our data adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that ASCT can be an effective treatment strategy with an acceptable safety profile in selected elderly patients. Further evaluation of its overall benefit is warranted, however, in those over 65 years of age, as RR appears to be considerably higher.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available