4.5 Review

Orofacial Neuropathic Pain-Basic Research and Their Clinical Relevancies

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.691396

Keywords

trigeminal nerve injury; trigeminal ganglion; trigeminal spinal subnucleus caudalis; craniofacial pain; oral diagnosis; treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Sato Fund
  2. Uemura Fund
  3. Dental Research Center, Nihon University School of Dentistry
  4. KAKENHI [17K11654, 18K09732, 19K10049]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K10049, 18K09732, 17K11654] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have shown that trigeminal nerve injury can lead to persistent orofacial pain, which is difficult to diagnose and treat. Animal research has revealed the involvement of various molecules in the communication between neurons and non-neuronal cells, as well as the potential ascending pathways in processing pathological orofacial pain.
Trigeminal nerve injury is known to cause severe persistent pain in the orofacial region. This pain is difficult to diagnose and treat. Recently, many animal studies have reported that rewiring of the peripheral and central nervous systems, non-neuronal cell activation, and up- and down-regulation of various molecules in non-neuronal cells are involved in the development of this pain following trigeminal nerve injury. However, there are many unknown mechanisms underlying the persistent orofacial pain associated with trigeminal nerve injury. In this review, we address recent animal data regarding the involvement of various molecules in the communication of neuronal and non-neuronal cells and examine the possible involvement of ascending pathways in processing pathological orofacial pain. We also address the clinical observations of persistent orofacial pain associated with trigeminal nerve injury and clinical approaches to their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available