4.7 Article

An estimate of the Bulk Silicate Earth potassium isotopic composition based on MC-ICPMS measurements of basalts

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 223-232

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.12.039

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Emerging Worlds program [NNX15AH66G]
  2. Harvard Origins of Life Initiative Postdoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a method for high-precision potassium isotope measurements that improves by an order of magnitude the precision compared to previous methods. The purification of K is achieved through ion exchange chromatography on AG50W-X8 cation exchange resins. The K-41/K-39 ratios are analyzed with a GV Instruments IsoProbe P Multiple-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) equipped with a hexapole collision gas cell. With this technique, the argon-hydride interferences as well as the large Ar-40(+) peak from the Ar-plasma are eliminated. The K-41/K-39 ratios can thus be obtained with a precision of 0.05 per mil. The precision and accuracy of this method is validated with gravimetrically determined 41 K or 39 K enriched standards. New precise K isotopic compositions of three terrestrial basalts (BCR-2, BHVO-1 and a MORB) are also reported. These basalts have indistinguishable K isotopic compositions and are used to define a reference value of -0.479 +/- 0.027 per mil for the K-41/K-39 ratio of the Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE) relative to a Merck Suprapur potassium nitrate standard. Seawater and sylvites from evaporite deposits have similar K-41/K-39 ratios, but higher by up to 0.227 per mil compared to the Merck Suprapur standard. Other commercially available K-salts/solutions also have K-41/K-39 ratios similar to the Merck standard, while a SPEX K-chloride was higher by 0.384 per mil. This shows that K isotope variations will be useful as a tracer in low-temperature geochemistry processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available