Journal
CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages 5907-5916Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4145
Keywords
oncology; pancreatic cancer; qualitative; service design; shared decision making
Categories
Funding
- KWF Kankerbestrijding [UL-12072]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined the implementation of shared decision making in oncology from a service design perspective, revealing that decision making is an ongoing and unpredictable process. The division of roles, tasks, and collaboration among healthcare professionals and patients or their significant others is often unclear, and obtaining and understanding information requires effort from patients and their significant others.
Purpose Solutions to improve the implementation of shared decision making (SDM) in oncology often focus on the consultation, with limited effects. In this study, we used a service design perspective on the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We aimed to understand how experiences of patients, their significant others, and medical professionals over the entire care path accumulate to support their ability to participate in SDM. Participants and methods We used qualitative interviews including design research techniques with 13 patients, 13 significant others, and 11 healthcare professionals, involved in the diagnosis or treatment of LAPC. The topic list was based on the literature and an auto-ethnography of the illness trajectory by a caregiver who is also a service design researcher. We conducted a thematic content analysis to identify themes influencing the ability to participate in SDM. Results We found four interconnected themes: (1) Decision making is an ongoing and unpredictable process with many decision moments, often unannounced. The unpredictability of the disease course, tumor response to treatment, and consequences of choices on the quality of life complicate decision making; (2) Division of roles, tasks, and collaboration among professionals and between professionals and patients and/or their significant others is often unclear to patients and their significant others; (3) It involves work for patients and their significant others to obtain and understand information; (4) In their disease journey, patients are confronted with unexpected energy drains and energy boosts, that influence their level of empowerment to participate in SDM. Conclusion The service design perspective uncovered how the stage for SDM is often set outside the consultation, which might explain the limited effect currently seen of interventions focusing on consultation itself. Our findings serve as a starting point for (re)designing care paths to improve the implementation of SDM in oncology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available