4.6 Article

What Factors Affect Commuters' Utility of Choosing Mobility as a Service? An Empirical Evidence from Seoul

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13169324

Keywords

Mobility as a Service (MaaS); shared transportation; mode choice; commuters; latent class model

Funding

  1. Incheon National University Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the factors influencing Seoul commuters' mode choice, identifying two latent classes: public transit-oriented commuters and balanced mode commuters. Most variables had significant impacts on MaaS choice, showing differences in coefficients between the two classes based on trip frequency by means.
Mobility as a Service (MaaS), which integrates public and shared transportation into a single service, is drawing attention as a travel demand management strategy aimed at reducing automobile dependency and encouraging public transit. In particular, there have been few studies that recognize traffic congestion during peak hours and identify related factors for practical application. The purpose of this study is to explore what factors affect Seoul commuters' mode choice including MaaS. A web-based survey that 161 commuters participated in was conducted to collect information about personal, household, and travel attributes, together with their mode preference for MaaS. A latent class model was developed to classify unobserved latent groups based on trip frequency by means and to identify factors influencing mode-specific utilities (in particular, MaaS service) for each class. The result shows that latent classes are divided into two groups (public transit-oriented commuters and balanced mode commuters). Most variables have significant impacts on choice for MaaS. The coefficient of MaaS choice of Class 1 and Class 2 were different. These findings suggest there is a difference between the classes according to trip frequency by means as an influencing factor in MaaS choice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available