4.6 Article

Multi-Stakeholder Platform in Water Resources Management: A Critical Analysis of Stakeholders' Participation for Sustainable Water Resources

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13169260

Keywords

MSP; representation; stakeholders; stakeholders' engagement; water governance; pluralistic approach

Funding

  1. Water Witness International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) play a crucial role in Tanzania's water resources management, but influential sectors or groups may dominate. The current platform design has inherent limitations, necessitating potential changes in stakeholders' attitudes and actions for sustainability.
Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have gained momentum in addressing contentious and cross-sectoral aspects of natural resources management. They have helped to enhance cross-learning and the inclusion of marginalized groups. Tanzania's water resources management sub-sector has championed these platforms as a means of breaking silos around planning, coordination, and resource mobilization. However, it is not uncommon to experience the occasional dominance of some influential sectors or groups due to their resources contribution to the process, contemporary influence, or statutory authority. Between 2013 and 2020, Tanzania has pioneered the establishment of MSPs at a national level and across the river and lake basins. This paper examines the representation of stakeholder groups in these platforms. Additionally, it establishes the baseline information that contributes to unlocking the current project-based platform design characterized by inherent limitations to potential changes in stakeholders' attitudes and actions. The research analyzed stakeholder's views, their representation, and the local and international literature to formulate opinions. Findings indicated that gender equality had not been adhered to despite being in the guidelines for establishing MSPs. The balance of public, private, and civil society organizations (CSOs) is acutely dominated by the public sector organizations, especially water-related ones. Finally, participation on the decision-making level is minimal, causing unsustainable platforms unless development partners continue to support operational costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available