4.6 Article

Could Unsustainable Electronics Support Sustainability?

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13126541

Keywords

sustainability; electronics; environmental footprint; social responsibility; life cycle assessment (LCA); circular economy

Funding

  1. F.R.S.-FNRS
  2. Fonds europeen de developpement regional (FEDER)
  3. Wallonia within the Wallonie-2020
  4. EU program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article challenges the belief that information and communication technologies are key to sustainability, highlighting the negative social and environmental impacts of digital technologies. It calls for a holistic approach and paradigm shift towards innovation and digital transition.
Information and communication technologies are often considered by policymakers, industrial stakeholders and scientists as a key lever in the run towards sustainability, since they should ease energy efficiency and dematerialization. In this opinion article, nurtured by the inputs of a broad panel of experts, we challenge this widely spread view by highlighting the detrimental social and environmental footprints caused by digital technologies. We further take a critical look on the ways innovation is conducted nowadays, i.e., with an almost exclusive focus on performance and few considerations for externalities. This leads us to call for academic teaching programs advocating for a holistic approach, for new business models, and for ambitious political decisions able to drive a paradigm shift in the mainstream agenda of electronics innovation and digital transition that shall significantly contribute to the well-being of everyone, everywhere, without compromising future generations. We conclude that digital technologies cannot support long-term sustainability if their only purpose remains the optimization of the current system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available