4.6 Article

Active Signage of Pedestrian Crossings as a Tool in Road Safety Management

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13169405

Keywords

pedestrian safety; unsignalized pedestrian crossing; active signage; yielding to pedestrians; vehicle speed

Funding

  1. Polish National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR-Mobis project)
  2. Warsaw Municipal Road Administration (ZDM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study confirmed that active pedestrian crossings equipped with flashing lights can effectively reduce vehicle speeds, increase the percentage of drivers yielding to pedestrians, decrease waiting time, and lower the probability of pedestrian injury accidents.
The main objective of the study was to verify the effectiveness of active pedestrian crossings equipped with flashing lights activated automatically by detected pedestrians. A pilot study was conducted in two sites, where speed profiles of vehicles over the distance of 30 m before the crossing were analyzed. The study produced promising results in terms of reducing vehicle speeds so the next study investigated four other unsignalized pedestrian crossings. They were video-recorded for 48 h each, before, after and a year after installation. The ANOVA test was used to check the statistical significance of changes in selected indicators. Even after a year from the installation, the effect of the active signage remained significant. The average percentage of drivers yielding to pedestrians was 77.4% higher and the average waiting time 25.2% lower than before the installation. The average speeds of vehicles were 3.53 km/h lower on collector and 2.60 km/h lower on arterial streets. A decline in the probability of a pedestrian being killed or severely injured (KSI) ranged from 6.3 pp (9.4%) on the arterial streets immediately after the installation up to 12.9 pp (31.7%) on the collector streets one year after.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available